Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 5:10:27 GMT -5
The lawyer who handled this matter was Jacqueline García de Blanck. Her colleague Mónica Olivares, who, like her, is part of the Commission on Animal Rights of the Madrid Bar Association, affirms that “they have always been very insistent with all the environmental associations that fight for Free Justice because we think it is a shame that "They have to be doing the work for the Administrations, challenging the laws and paying for it with their own resources." She points out that most of society, including legal operators, “ is not aware that there is a complementary law to Law 1/1996 that establishes the general requirements for access to Free Legal Assistance.
In environmental matters, we have Law 27/2006, which allows legal entities that have environmental protection among their purposes access to this right." This lawyer regrets that this DJ USA law is ignored by the commissions in charge of granting free justice. Monica Olivares. (Image: ICAM) The first time Olivares managed to be granted Free Justice to an organization for the protection of the environment, two years ago, he represented Grupo Lobo Euskadi . The same thing happened as on this occasion: they denied it and, later, the court granted it. “We encourage all associations and NGOs that are defending the environment to claim this rule because the competent bodies are rejecting it. It is a shame because those entities that do not have the money to pay a lawyer specializing in administrative litigation cannot appeal,” he says. And he regrets that “this had to reach the Supreme Court because the right should have been recognized by the regional commissions or by the Central Commission of Free Justice.
The lawyer emphasizes that this case is also especially interesting because the Supreme Court has confirmed that a political party, if it meets the requirements established by law, can benefit from Free Justice , contrary to what is maintained by the State Attorney's Office. Regarding the main issue of the litigation with which they have reached the Supreme Court, Olivares states that it is “absolutely unprecedented and inadmissible for these barbaric activities to be declared an Asset of Cultural Interest. For this reason, PACMA has been trying to reverse that statement for two years.”Sexual advances, verbal and physical, to a colleague are serious enough to be fired The disciplinary sanction of a worker who made sexist comments and touched the ass of another employee was ratified (Photo: E&J) The Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia has ratified a company's decision to disciplinaryly dismiss a worker after learning that he made sexist comments and groped a co-worker without her consent.
In environmental matters, we have Law 27/2006, which allows legal entities that have environmental protection among their purposes access to this right." This lawyer regrets that this DJ USA law is ignored by the commissions in charge of granting free justice. Monica Olivares. (Image: ICAM) The first time Olivares managed to be granted Free Justice to an organization for the protection of the environment, two years ago, he represented Grupo Lobo Euskadi . The same thing happened as on this occasion: they denied it and, later, the court granted it. “We encourage all associations and NGOs that are defending the environment to claim this rule because the competent bodies are rejecting it. It is a shame because those entities that do not have the money to pay a lawyer specializing in administrative litigation cannot appeal,” he says. And he regrets that “this had to reach the Supreme Court because the right should have been recognized by the regional commissions or by the Central Commission of Free Justice.
The lawyer emphasizes that this case is also especially interesting because the Supreme Court has confirmed that a political party, if it meets the requirements established by law, can benefit from Free Justice , contrary to what is maintained by the State Attorney's Office. Regarding the main issue of the litigation with which they have reached the Supreme Court, Olivares states that it is “absolutely unprecedented and inadmissible for these barbaric activities to be declared an Asset of Cultural Interest. For this reason, PACMA has been trying to reverse that statement for two years.”Sexual advances, verbal and physical, to a colleague are serious enough to be fired The disciplinary sanction of a worker who made sexist comments and touched the ass of another employee was ratified (Photo: E&J) The Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia has ratified a company's decision to disciplinaryly dismiss a worker after learning that he made sexist comments and groped a co-worker without her consent.
